Faster shortlisting
Prioritize the highest-fit candidates earlier with structured screening signals.
Features
Powerful Features for Structured Teacher Hiring Decisions
Hyriki gives school leaders a connected hiring workflow for assessments, screening, demo evaluation, interviews, and reports so every shortlist and final decision is built on consistent evidence.
More consistent evaluation
Use shared rubrics and scorecards across assessments, demos, and interviews.
Lower manual coordination
Keep review status, scheduling, and team feedback in one workflow.
Clear decision-ready reports
Review shortlist evidence and hiring summaries without stitching data manually.
Core Platform Capabilities
Modules grouped by the hiring workflow schools actually run
Instead of a flat feature list, Hyriki organizes capabilities around how school teams configure evaluations, review evidence, coordinate interviews, and finalize hiring decisions.
AI-Powered Assessments
Configure role-relevant assessments for subject knowledge, pedagogy, and competencies.
How it works
- Create assessment packages aligned to subject, grade band, and role expectations
- Use rubric-based scoring and pass thresholds for consistent review
- Generate question-set drafts with guardrails before publishing
Output artifacts
Assessment packageCandidate scorecardSection-wise strengths
Automated Screening & Shortlisting
Parse resumes, normalize profiles, and rank candidates using role-fit criteria.
How it works
- Standardize candidate data from resumes and applications
- Apply criteria-driven ranking using role requirements and evaluation signals
- Generate shortlist recommendations with flags and fit breakdowns
Output artifacts
Ranked listFit score breakdownShortlist export
Structured Interviews & Scheduling
Coordinate interview slots and feedback using a standardized evaluation process.
How it works
- Set question sets and evaluation criteria by role or stage
- Share self-serve booking links with shortlisted candidates
- Track scheduling, reminders, reschedules, and interview completion status
Output artifacts
Interview scheduleFeedback scorecardStatus tracking
Analytics & Reporting
Monitor funnel progression, cycle time, and job-level hiring performance.
How it works
- Track stage movement from application through hire
- Compare job pipelines and cohort quality across hiring cycles
- Export reports for leadership review and operational follow-up
Output artifacts
Hiring dashboardPer-job analyticsReport downloads
Fairness & Bias Reduction
Reduce subjective variance with structured criteria and auditable decisions.
How it works
- Use standardized scoring across evaluators and stages
- Support anonymized views where appropriate for fairer review
- Capture rationale and evaluation evidence in a traceable trail
Output artifacts
Decision trailConsistency signalsRationale records
Time & Workflow Automation
Connect assessments, shortlist reviews, demos, and interviews in one operating flow.
How it works
- Move candidates through shared stages without manual spreadsheet coordination
- Keep teams aligned with status tracking and review checkpoints
- Bundle outputs into decision-ready summaries for final discussion
Output artifacts
Stage visibilityTeam coordinationDecision-ready reports
Assessments
Assessments: Role-Relevant Evaluation Setup and Scoring
Build structured assessments for subject knowledge, pedagogy, and teaching competencies so schools can evaluate candidates before live rounds with a consistent standard.
What you configure
- Assessment types: subject knowledge, pedagogy, and competency checks
- Difficulty level, section structure, and question distribution
- Rubric weights, pass/fail thresholds, and review criteria
- Generative question-set drafts with role guardrails before publishing
What the platform does
- Generates role-aligned question sets based on configured scope and constraints
- Scores responses using structured rubric logic for consistent evaluation
- Organizes results into real-time scoring reports and comparison-ready views
What you get
- Candidate scorecard
- Section-wise strengths and weak areas
- Pass/fail threshold status
- Comparison view across candidates for the same role
- Assessment types: subject knowledge, pedagogy, and competency checks
- Difficulty level, section structure, and question distribution
- Rubric weights, pass/fail thresholds, and review criteria
- Generative question-set drafts with role guardrails before publishing
Configure role
Publish assessment
Candidate completes
Scoring report
Shortlist signal
Best for: Useful for both single schools and school groups that need consistent role-level screening across multiple hiring teams.
Screening & Shortlisting
Resume Parsing + Screening: Criteria-Driven Ranking and Shortlist Recommendations
Move from resume volume to a prioritized review queue by normalizing profiles, applying role-fit criteria, and combining screening signals into a shortlist-ready ranking.
What you configure
- Role-fit criteria: subject, experience, grade level, location, required qualifications
- Must-have vs preferred screening conditions
- Shortlist thresholds and review flags
What the platform does
- Parses resumes and normalizes candidate profiles into comparable fields
- Scores role-fit based on configured criteria and available assessment signals
- Ranks candidates and highlights strengths, gaps, and edge-case review flags
What you get
- Ranked candidate list
- Fit score breakdown by criteria
- Flags and highlights for manual review
- Shortlist export for team discussion
- Role-fit criteria: subject, experience, grade level, location, required qualifications
- Must-have vs preferred screening conditions
- Shortlist thresholds and review flags
Applications
Resume parsing
Role-fit scoring
Ranked queue
Shortlist export
Best for: Especially useful when application volume is high or multiple reviewers need a shared shortlist baseline.
Demo Evaluation
Demo Evaluation: Guided Prompts, Rubrics, and Team Review
Standardize demo review across panels using guided prompts and evaluation dimensions so teaching demos become comparable evidence rather than unstructured impressions.
What you configure
- Guided demo prompts by role and teaching level
- Evaluation dimensions such as lesson planning, engagement, and clarity
- Rubric criteria and panel review expectations
What the platform does
- Collects demo submissions in a structured review workflow
- Presents rubric-led evaluation forms for each reviewer
- Aggregates notes, rubric scores, and comparison views for team review
What you get
- Demo evaluation summary
- Rubric scores by dimension
- Reviewer notes + team review context
- Shortlist readiness signal
- Guided demo prompts by role and teaching level
- Evaluation dimensions such as lesson planning, engagement, and clarity
- Rubric criteria and panel review expectations
Prompt assigned
Demo submitted
Panel review
Comparison
Shortlist readiness
Best for: Ideal for schools that involve principals, academic coordinators, and subject leads in demo review.
Interviews & Scheduling
Structured Interviews + Scheduling: Coordinated Slots and Standardized Feedback
Coordinate interview rounds after shortlisting with shared questions, self-serve booking links, and a single schedule and feedback record for the hiring team.
What you configure
- Interview question sets and evaluation criteria by role
- Interviewer availability and stage ownership
- Candidate booking windows, reminders, and rescheduling policies
What the platform does
- Shares self-serve slot booking for shortlisted candidates
- Keeps interviewer coordination and status updates in one schedule view
- Captures structured interview feedback scorecards after each round
What you get
- Interview schedule view
- Interview feedback scorecard
- Status tracking: scheduled, completed, overdue
- Final discussion-ready interview record
- Interview question sets and evaluation criteria by role
- Interviewer availability and stage ownership
- Candidate booking windows, reminders, and rescheduling policies
Shortlist
Share booking
Candidate books
Interview feedback
Final decision
Best for: Useful when interviewers are spread across academic and leadership stakeholders and scheduling coordination slows decisions.
Analytics & Reports
Analytics & Reports: Funnel Visibility, Cycle Time, and Hiring Performance
Track how candidates move through the hiring funnel and generate exportable reports for school leaders reviewing speed, consistency, and job-level hiring outcomes.
What you configure
- Hiring stages and funnel tracking checkpoints
- Role/job filters and reporting windows
- Export formats and reporting views for leadership review
What the platform does
- Aggregates funnel movement from applications to hire across stages
- Calculates time-to-hire visibility and job-level workflow performance
- Generates per-job and cohort comparisons with export-ready summaries
What you get
- Hiring dashboard
- Report downloads
- Per-job analytics
- Cohort comparison views
- Hiring stages and funnel tracking checkpoints
- Role/job filters and reporting windows
- Export formats and reporting views for leadership review
Track stage events
Aggregate funnels
Compare jobs
Export reports
Best for: Best for school operators and leadership teams reviewing hiring throughput across roles or campuses.
Fairness & Controls
Fairness & Bias Reduction: Structured Criteria and Audit-Friendly Decisions
Improve consistency across evaluators with standardized scoring, structured review surfaces, and decision trails that make final discussions easier to justify and revisit.
What you configure
- Structured evaluation criteria across assessment, demo, and interview stages
- Standardized scoring rubrics and shared reviewer guidance
- Anonymized candidate view options where appropriate
What the platform does
- Applies the same scoring framework across reviewers and candidates
- Captures evaluation notes and scorecards in a unified record
- Maintains audit-friendly decision trails for shortlist and final decisions
What you get
- Consistency across evaluators
- Decision rationale trail
- Reduced subjective variance in review discussions
- Clearer handoff from panel feedback to final decision
- Structured evaluation criteria across assessment, demo, and interview stages
- Standardized scoring rubrics and shared reviewer guidance
- Anonymized candidate view options where appropriate
Set criteria
Standardized scoring
Reviewer notes
Decision trail
Best for: Important for school teams that want a repeatable evaluation process across subjects, campuses, or hiring panels.
Workflow
Simplified hiring process mapped across schools and teachers
Hyriki connects school hiring operations and candidate steps in a single system so assessments, demo evaluation, scheduling, and reports stay aligned from intake to final decision.
School Teams
Configure criteria, review evidence, make decisionsHyriki workflow engine
AssessmentsShortlistsDemo evaluationInterviewsReports
Teacher Candidates
Apply, complete evaluations, track status, book interviewsFor Schools flow
Six structured steps from role setup to final interview decision
- 01
Create role & hiring criteria
Standardized job briefDefine subject, grades, experience, location, and hiring priorities in a structured job setup.
UI snippetRole setup panel - 02
Configure assessments + demo rubric
Assessment package + demo rubricSet assessment structure, scoring thresholds, and demo evaluation dimensions before intake begins.
UI snippetAssessment config - 03
Publish job link / collect applications
Unified candidate pipelineShare one link and centralize candidate submissions in a single hiring pipeline.
UI snippetApplication intake board - 04
Screen + shortlist candidates
Ranked shortlist queueUse resume parsing, role-fit scoring, and evaluation signals to prioritize manual review effort.
UI snippetShortlist ranking view - 05
Review demos + panel notes
Demo evaluation summaryCapture rubric scores and team notes in a structured demo evaluation workflow.
UI snippetDemo review scorecard - 06
Schedule interviews + finalize decision
Interview-ready final decision packCoordinate slots, collect interview feedback, and finalize hiring with supporting reports.
UI snippetScheduling + status tracker
For Teachers flow
Five connected steps from application to interview booking
- 01
Apply / upload resume
Normalized profileSubmit application details and resume once for structured profile intake.
UI snippetCandidate application flow - 02
Complete assessment
Assessment resultTake role-relevant assessment sections aligned to subject and pedagogy expectations.
UI snippetAssessment experience - 03
Record guided demo
Demo submissionFollow prompts and submit a teaching demo using a structured review format.
UI snippetDemo prompt workspace - 04
Track status
Stage visibilitySee progress across assessment review, demo evaluation, and shortlist updates.
UI snippetApplication status view - 05
Book interview slot (if shortlisted)
Interview confirmationChoose an available interview slot through a self-serve scheduling link.
UI snippetSlot booking panel
Feature Comparison
Compare feature coverage by plan tier
Use this capability view for a quick evaluation. For full commercial details, pricing, and plan fit, review the dedicated pricing page.
| Feature area | Bronze | Silver | Gold | Platinum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Job posting volume Volume & Access | Pay per job | 5 / year | 10 / year | 50 / year |
Application review capacity | Up to 50 / job | Up to 100 / job | Up to 200 / job | Up to 200 / job |
Admin users | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
Assessments Evaluation | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Proctoring | Basic | Basic | Advanced | Advanced |
Demo evaluation | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Interview scheduling Workflow | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Selection recommendations | Not included | Included | Included | Included |
Job posting volume
- Bronze
- Pay per job
- Silver
- 5 / year
- Gold
- 10 / year
- Platinum
- 50 / year
Application review capacity
- Bronze
- Up to 50 / job
- Silver
- Up to 100 / job
- Gold
- Up to 200 / job
- Platinum
- Up to 200 / job
Admin users
- Bronze
- 1
- Silver
- 1
- Gold
- 2
- Platinum
- 5
Trust & Proof
Built for schools that need a structured hiring process, not just a form tool
The platform is designed for school leaders, academic teams, and hiring panels that need consistent evaluation, cleaner coordination, and decision-ready records.
Built for school hiring teams
Role setup, assessments, demos, shortlists, and interviews are connected in one workflow instead of split across tools.
Structured evaluations by design
Shared rubrics and scorecards help principals, coordinators, and panels compare candidates consistently.
Decision-ready reporting
Shortlist, demo, interview, and funnel outputs are organized for leadership review and follow-up.
Privacy-aware review controls
Use standardized records and configured review visibility to reduce ad hoc sharing and fragmented notes.
School Leadership
Hyriki made our teacher hiring process far more structured. Our team could review candidates faster, compare evaluations with clarity, and rely on the assessment and demo reports to build better shortlists without constant manual follow-up.
Anita AgrawalFounder DirectorEva Group of Schools
Executive Leadership
The platform helped us streamline hiring from applications to shortlist and interview readiness. Scoring reports made decisions more consistent across reviewers, and the process felt professional for both our team and candidates.
Deep PatelExecutive DirectorDon Bosco, Badlapur
Next Step
Replace manual, inconsistent teacher hiring with a structured workflow and decision-ready reports
Configure assessments, review shortlist signals, standardize demo evaluation, coordinate interviews, and finalize decisions with one connected process built for school teams.